WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.870 align:middle line:90% Hello. 00:00:00.870 --> 00:00:01.710 align:middle line:90% Hello. 00:00:01.710 --> 00:00:03.090 align:middle line:90% How are you? 00:00:03.090 --> 00:00:04.590 align:middle line:90% Fine. 00:00:04.590 --> 00:00:08.100 align:middle line:84% So when you're doing pupillometry studies, 00:00:08.100 --> 00:00:11.640 align:middle line:84% do you also often use gaze as a measure? 00:00:11.640 --> 00:00:15.450 align:middle line:84% Yes, I do first of all, when you're doing pupillometry, 00:00:15.450 --> 00:00:17.470 align:middle line:90% you're also doing eye tracking. 00:00:17.470 --> 00:00:20.790 align:middle line:84% So you have that data automatically. 00:00:20.790 --> 00:00:24.660 align:middle line:84% And it's very useful to look at it. 00:00:24.660 --> 00:00:27.910 align:middle line:84% And what kinds of reasons is it useful? 00:00:27.910 --> 00:00:31.090 align:middle line:90% Well, a couple of reasons. 00:00:31.090 --> 00:00:38.250 align:middle line:84% One reason is that in most pupillometry studies, people, 00:00:38.250 --> 00:00:42.180 align:middle line:84% participants are required to maintain fixation. 00:00:42.180 --> 00:00:43.920 align:middle line:84% Then if you have eye-tracking data, 00:00:43.920 --> 00:00:47.610 align:middle line:90% you can actually validate that. 00:00:47.610 --> 00:00:52.320 align:middle line:84% You can make sure that people were maintaining fixation. 00:00:52.320 --> 00:00:56.470 align:middle line:84% Also, there are many studies that 00:00:56.470 --> 00:01:00.700 align:middle line:84% want people to look at something in a very spontaneous way, 00:01:00.700 --> 00:01:03.580 align:middle line:84% for example, you're showing a photograph. 00:01:03.580 --> 00:01:12.310 align:middle line:84% So in that case, you cannot control completely 00:01:12.310 --> 00:01:15.730 align:middle line:84% the luminance condition because every photograph will have 00:01:15.730 --> 00:01:18.370 align:middle line:84% parts that are darker or brighter. 00:01:18.370 --> 00:01:24.340 align:middle line:84% Then by checking where people are looking on the photograph, 00:01:24.340 --> 00:01:30.280 align:middle line:84% you may know, for example, what could be causing the pupil 00:01:30.280 --> 00:01:34.930 align:middle line:84% to change, whether it is the content of the image 00:01:34.930 --> 00:01:39.100 align:middle line:84% or the differences in luminance in the image? 00:01:39.100 --> 00:01:40.240 align:middle line:90% Mm-hmm. 00:01:40.240 --> 00:01:43.360 align:middle line:84% And do you have an example of this? 00:01:43.360 --> 00:01:44.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:01:44.920 --> 00:01:48.520 align:middle line:84% As a matter of fact, it was very important in order 00:01:48.520 --> 00:01:52.540 align:middle line:90% to understand this illusion. 00:01:52.540 --> 00:01:57.580 align:middle line:84% This is called the face race lightness illusion. 00:01:57.580 --> 00:02:00.850 align:middle line:84% So you see there are two faces side by side. 00:02:00.850 --> 00:02:01.600 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:02:01.600 --> 00:02:03.910 align:middle line:90% One looks European. 00:02:03.910 --> 00:02:05.990 align:middle line:90% One looks African. 00:02:05.990 --> 00:02:07.810 align:middle line:84% Now, you look at these two images, 00:02:07.810 --> 00:02:13.270 align:middle line:84% and you tell me which of the two faces looks darker? 00:02:13.270 --> 00:02:15.310 align:middle line:84% To me, the African face looks darker. 00:02:15.310 --> 00:02:17.150 align:middle line:90% The African looks dark. 00:02:17.150 --> 00:02:22.910 align:middle line:84% However, each face has the same luminance than the other. 00:02:22.910 --> 00:02:26.030 align:middle line:90% So that's why it's an illusion. 00:02:26.030 --> 00:02:29.890 align:middle line:84% Now, there may be several explanations for this, 00:02:29.890 --> 00:02:33.070 align:middle line:84% but what we thought is that people 00:02:33.070 --> 00:02:38.570 align:middle line:84% are likely to look at each face a bit differently. 00:02:38.570 --> 00:02:41.370 align:middle line:84% What do you mean looking differently? 00:02:41.370 --> 00:02:44.450 align:middle line:84% For example, they might look at the European face 00:02:44.450 --> 00:02:49.010 align:middle line:84% in a way that will change their pupil or the African face 00:02:49.010 --> 00:02:52.560 align:middle line:84% in a way that would change the pupil in another direction. 00:02:52.560 --> 00:02:56.900 align:middle line:84% So if you look at the images a bit closely, 00:02:56.900 --> 00:03:00.710 align:middle line:84% you see that the nose of the European face 00:03:00.710 --> 00:03:04.980 align:middle line:84% is a bit dark compared to the nose of the African face. 00:03:04.980 --> 00:03:07.970 align:middle line:84% If you look at the eyes, the eyes of the African face 00:03:07.970 --> 00:03:11.930 align:middle line:84% are a bit brighter than the eyes of the European face. 00:03:11.930 --> 00:03:17.030 align:middle line:84% This means that, for example, if participants 00:03:17.030 --> 00:03:22.250 align:middle line:84% would tend to look more at the nose of the European face, 00:03:22.250 --> 00:03:29.870 align:middle line:84% they would be a little bit more stimulated by the darker parts 00:03:29.870 --> 00:03:30.800 align:middle line:90% of the image. 00:03:30.800 --> 00:03:32.510 align:middle line:84% Whereas if they tend to look more 00:03:32.510 --> 00:03:34.940 align:middle line:84% at the eyes of the African face, there 00:03:34.940 --> 00:03:38.930 align:middle line:84% would be stimulated more by the brighter parts of the face, 00:03:38.930 --> 00:03:41.790 align:middle line:84% and that's exactly what happened. 00:03:41.790 --> 00:03:43.610 align:middle line:84% And so for this study, you looked, 00:03:43.610 --> 00:03:46.190 align:middle line:84% then used gaze to see where on the face they were looking? 00:03:46.190 --> 00:03:51.680 align:middle line:84% Yes, what you have to do in order to make this efficient 00:03:51.680 --> 00:03:55.200 align:middle line:84% is to do an area of interest analysis. 00:03:55.200 --> 00:04:02.250 align:middle line:84% So what you do is you parse the images by face parts, 00:04:02.250 --> 00:04:07.040 align:middle line:84% and then you can compute the percentage of time 00:04:07.040 --> 00:04:11.690 align:middle line:84% that the eyes are actually spending within each 00:04:11.690 --> 00:04:13.490 align:middle line:90% of these area of interest. 00:04:13.490 --> 00:04:19.100 align:middle line:84% And then you get a sort of a statistical frequency 00:04:19.100 --> 00:04:21.470 align:middle line:84% of looking at parts of the face that will 00:04:21.470 --> 00:04:25.580 align:middle line:90% tend to be lighter or darker. 00:04:25.580 --> 00:04:27.780 align:middle line:90% And these are the results. 00:04:27.780 --> 00:04:31.430 align:middle line:84% You can see that there is a bit more tendency 00:04:31.430 --> 00:04:36.620 align:middle line:84% to look at the nose for the European face 00:04:36.620 --> 00:04:41.800 align:middle line:84% and to the eyes for the African face. 00:04:41.800 --> 00:04:44.950 align:middle line:84% So this explains the illusion then? 00:04:44.950 --> 00:04:51.130 align:middle line:84% Yes, potentially, it can because it does show that behaviour 00:04:51.130 --> 00:04:56.050 align:middle line:84% will increase the likelihood to see the image with a large 00:04:56.050 --> 00:04:58.300 align:middle line:90% pupil or with a small pupil. 00:04:58.300 --> 00:05:01.510 align:middle line:84% If you see one image with the larger pupil, 00:05:01.510 --> 00:05:02.710 align:middle line:90% it will look brighter. 00:05:02.710 --> 00:05:06.400 align:middle line:84% If you see the other image with a slightly smaller pupil, 00:05:06.400 --> 00:05:09.170 align:middle line:90% it will look darker. 00:05:09.170 --> 00:05:11.870 align:middle line:84% Well, this is an interesting way of combining these two 00:05:11.870 --> 00:05:12.650 align:middle line:90% measures. 00:05:12.650 --> 00:05:15.250 align:middle line:90% Yes, it's just an example. 00:05:15.250 --> 00:05:26.000 align:middle line:90%